Fundamental Attribution Error Prejudice
messages) This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of ultimate attribution error example original research should be removed. (February 2015) (Learn how and when to ultimate attribution error quizlet remove this template message) This article relies too much on references to primary sources. Please improve this by
Causal Attribution Definition
adding secondary or tertiary sources. (February 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) In social psychology, the
Actor Observer Error
fundamental attribution error, also known as the correspondence bias or attribution effect, is the tendency for people to place an undue emphasis on internal characteristics of the agent (character or intention), rather than external factors, in explaining another person's behavior in a given situation. This contrasts with interpreting one's own behavior, where situational factors are more easily recognized and can self-serving error be taken into account. Contents 1 Examples 2 Details 3 Classic demonstration study: Jones and Harris (1967) 4 Explanations 5 Cultural differences in the error 6 Versus correspondence bias 7 See also 7.1 Cognitive biases 8 References 9 Further reading 10 External links Examples[edit] As a simple example, consider a situation where Alice, a driver, is about to pass through an intersection. Her light turns green and she begins to accelerate, but another car drives through the red light and crosses in front of her. The fundamental attribution error may lead her to think that the driver of the other car was an unskilled or reckless driver. This will be an error if the other driver had a good reason for running the light, such as rushing a patient to the hospital. If this is the case and Alice had been driving the other car, she would have understood that the situation called for speed at the cost of safety, but when seeing it from the outside she was inclined to believe that the behavior of
This article relies too much on references to primary sources. Please improve this by adding secondary or tertiary sources.
Duncan 1976 Stereotypes
(February 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) fundamental attribution error examples This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to fundamental attribution error definition reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (February 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) (Learn how and when to remove this template https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error message) The ultimate attribution error is a group-level attribution error that offers an explanation for how one person views different causes of negative and positive behavior in ingroup and outgroup members.[1] Contents 1 Definition 2 Overview 3 Explaining away positive behavior of outgroup members 3.1 Exceptional case 3.2 Luck or special advantage 3.3 Highly motivated 3.4 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_attribution_error Situational 4 Evidence 5 See also 6 References Definition[edit] Ultimate attribution error is the tendency to internally attribute negative outgroup and positive ingroup behaviour and to externally attribute positive outgroup and negative ingroup behaviour. So in other words, ultimate attribution error arises as a way to explain an outgroup's negative behaviour as flaws in their personality, and to explain an outgroup's positive behaviour as a result of chance or circumstance. It is also the belief that positive acts performed by ingroup members are as a result of their personality, whereas, if an ingroup member behaves negatively (which is believed to be rare), it is a result of situational factors.[2] Overview[edit] The ultimate attribution error was first established by Thomas F. Pettigrew in his 1979 publication "The Ultimate Attribution Error: Extending Allport's Cognitive Analysis of Prejudice".[1] As the title suggests, the ultimate attribution error is a theoretical extension of Gordon Allport's work in attribution theory. The ultimate attribution error is a systematic patterning of intergroup mi
messages) This article possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (February 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article relies too https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_attribution_error much on references to primary sources. Please improve this by adding secondary or tertiary sources. http://study.com/academy/lesson/fundamental-attribution-error-definition-lesson-quiz.html (February 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) In social psychology, the fundamental attribution error, also known as the correspondence bias or attribution effect, is the tendency for people to place an undue emphasis on internal characteristics of the agent (character or intention), rather than external factors, in explaining another person's attribution error behavior in a given situation. This contrasts with interpreting one's own behavior, where situational factors are more easily recognized and can be taken into account. Contents 1 Examples 2 Details 3 Classic demonstration study: Jones and Harris (1967) 4 Explanations 5 Cultural differences in the error 6 Versus correspondence bias 7 See also 7.1 Cognitive biases 8 References 9 Further reading 10 External links Examples[edit] As a simple example, consider a situation where Alice, a driver, is about to fundamental attribution error pass through an intersection. Her light turns green and she begins to accelerate, but another car drives through the red light and crosses in front of her. The fundamental attribution error may lead her to think that the driver of the other car was an unskilled or reckless driver. This will be an error if the other driver had a good reason for running the light, such as rushing a patient to the hospital. If this is the case and Alice had been driving the other car, she would have understood that the situation called for speed at the cost of safety, but when seeing it from the outside she was inclined to believe that the behavior of the other driver reflected their fundamental nature (having poor driving skills or a reckless attitude). Another example relates to a slippery path: A traveler carefully walks down a sloped path in the rain. The traveler slips and falls. The traveler believes this is a slippery path. The traveler continues more carefully. At the bottom of the slope, the traveler rests while waiting for the rain to stop. The traveler sees another person carefully walking down the sloped path. The traveler sees that person slip on the path. The traveler believes that person is clumsy. Details[edit] The phrase was coined by Lee Ross[1] some years after a classic experiment by Edward E. Jones and Victor Harris (
Test Prep Teacher Certification Professional Development By Education Level College High School Middle School Explore over 3,000 video courses Browse All Courses Credit Credit Credit Options Online College Credit High School & GED Certificates of Completion How it Works Earn Transferable Credit & Get your Degree fast Learn more Degrees Degrees Find Degrees by Subject Agriculture Architecture Biological and Biomedical Sciences Business Communications and Journalism Computer Sciences Culinary Arts and Personal Services Education Engineering Legal Liberal Arts and Humanities Mechanic and Repair Technologies Medical and Health Professions Physical Sciences Psychology Transportation and Distribution Visual and Performing Arts By Level High School Diploma Associates Degrees Bachelor Degrees Master Degrees Online Degrees Find a degree that fits your goals Search degrees Schools Schools Browse Schools by Degree Level Graduate Degrees High School Diplomas Certificate Programs Post Degree Certificates Undergraduate Degrees Browse Schools Public Schools by State University Video Reviews Career Counseling & Job Center Job Interviewing Tip Videos Job Networking Videos Résumé How To Videos Job Search Tips Career Videos Career Research Researching Careers Videos Glossary of Careers Career Info by Degree Job Outlook by Region Degree & Career Research Articles Contact Support Copyright Video: Fundamental Attribution Error: Definition & Overview This lesson covers the fundamental attribution error. You might be surprised to find out that your explanation of why people do what they do is more often inaccurate than it is accurate. Social Psychology: Tutoring Solution / Psychology Courses Course Navigator Proprioception: Definition & ExercisesNext Lesson Fundamental Attribution Error: Definition & Overview Chapter3 / Lesson9 Transcript Video Quiz & Worksheet - Fundamental Attribution Er